Mr R North v David Einig Ltd: 3313489/2019
JUDGMENT
Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Response[1]The Respondent failed to present a response to the claim and judgment is entered in favour of the Claimant as follows. Protective Award[2]The complaint that the Respondent failed to comply with a requirement of section 188 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, presented under section 189(1)(d) of the Act, is well founded.[3]The protected period is 90 days beginning with 28 March 2018.[4]The protective award is £9,642.86 (£750 x 90 days [126/7 weeks]). Unauthorised Deduction from Wages[5]The Claimant is owed wages and is awarded £1,000 in compensation. Total Award[6]The total award is £10,642.86 and the Respondent is ordered to pay this sum to the Claimant. Hearing[7]The hearing listed on 21 February 2020 is cancelled. Page 1 of 2 Case Number: 3313489/2019 Public Access to Employment Tribunal Judgments[8]The parties are informed that all judgments and reasons for judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the Claimant and Respondent.