Ms R Tate and Mr M Beia v Neets Plug Ltd: 3313330/2019 and 3313331/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The First Claimant’s complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages, holiday pay and notice pay are well founded. The respondent is ordered to pay the First Claimant (Ms R Tate) £2,657, consisting of unpaid wages of £1,194, holiday pay of £913, and notice pay of £550.[2]The Second Claimant’s complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages, holiday pay and notice pay are well founded. The respondent is ordered to pay the Second Claimant (Mr M Beia) the sum of £1,595, consisting of wages of £557.69 and holiday pay of £479.62 and notice pay of £557.69.REASONS
[1]The claimants did not attend the hearing but made written representations. The respondent failed to present a response and did not attend.[2]The claimants were dismissed on 6 December 2018.[3]The claimants were asked to give details of their complaints which they did by way of letter, responding to the Employment Tribunal’s letter dated 9 December 2019. Case Number: 3313330/2019 & 3313331/2019[4]The First Claimant, Ms Tate, stated that her unpaid wages amounted to £1,194 gross. She was owed holiday pay of 7.5 days, at £913 gross, and one weeks’ notice pay of £550 net.[5]I consider that the complaints are well founded and give judgment for a total of £2,657.[6]The Second Claimant, Mr Beia, provided details of his complaint also. He alleges that he is owed wages of £557.69 gross, holiday pay of £479.62 gross (based on 5 days outstanding holiday) and notice pay of £557.69 net.[7]I am satisfied the complaints are well founded and give judgment for £1,595.