Mr S Mezali v Shorterm Ltd: 3312829/2021
JUDGMENT
This has been a hybrid hearing which has been consented to by the parties. The claimant attended the hearing centre in person, the respondent participated by video link through HMCTS Cloud Video Platform. A full face-to-face hearing was not held because the relevant matters could be determined in a part-in person and part-remote hearing. Upon hearing the claimant and hearing the respondent’s representative and Ms C Davis for the respondent, the Judgment of the Employment Tribunal is that:[1]The claimant’s claims in respect of outstanding wages and non-payment of expenses have been dealt with in Manchester County Court proceedings, under Claim No: D6QZ89NR.[2]The claimant’s complaint in respect of an itemised pay statement is refused as such wages and expenses that were deemed payable arose from the orders made from the aforementioned Manchester County Court proceedings. In such circumstances, the Employment Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to make an order under s8 Employment Rights Act 1996. Case Number: 3312829/2021 H[3]Proceedings are now dismissed.