Mr R Falconer v Imserv Europe Ltd: 3312704/2023
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim succeeds and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. _____________________________ Regional Employment Judge Foxwell Date: 31 July 2024REASONS
Judgment was entered against the respondent under rule 21 of the 2013 Rules on 31 July 2024 in error on the basis that it had not entered a response. The Tribunal had written to it on 19 March 2024 saying that no response was required until further order and no such further order had been made when judgment was entered against it. Approved by: Regional Employment Judge Foxwell 21 January 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 30 January 2025 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 3312704/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr R Falconer Respondent: Imserv Europe Limited Heard at: Norwich Employment Tribunal (in public; by CVP) On: 10 February 2026 Before: Employment Judge Gordon Walker (sitting alone) Appearances For the claimant: in person For the respondent: Mr P Nainthy, solicitor JUDGMENT[1]The claimant’s application to amend the claim to add a claim of victimisation is refused.[2]The claimant’s claim is struck out pursuant to rule 38(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 because the claimant does not have the requisite service required to bring a claim of unfair dismissal (as required by section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996). Approved by: