Mrs J Cammish and others v Catherine Ltd and The Retreats (Cambridge) Ltd: 3312533/2020 and others
JUDGMENT
As at 31 August 2020, the Fifth Claimant, Miss Maughan, had been continuously employed by the First Respondent for six years. 21 February 2022 Employment Judge Tynan Sent to the parties on: ....................... ............................................................ For the Tribunal Office Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case Number: 3312533/2020 3312900/2020 3314008/2020 3314435/2020 3313238/2020 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent(1) Mrs J Cammish;(2) Miss S Langhorn;(3) Miss C Poole;(4) Ms N Webb; and(5) Miss H Maughan v (1) Catherine Limited; and (2) The Retreats (Cambridge) Limited Heard at: Cambridge On: 18 March 2022 Before: Employment Judge Tynan Appearances For all of the Claimants: In person For the First Respondent: Ms Catherine Karr, Director For the Second Respondent: Ms Anastasia Jolley, Director JUDGMENT[1]There was no ‘relevant transfer’ (within the meaning of Regulation 3(1) of the TUPE Regulations 2006) of the First Respondent’s business, or any part of it, to the Second Respondent. In the circumstances, the First Respondent is solely liable to make the redundancy payments referred to below.[2]The Claimants were dismissed by the First Respondent by reason of redundancy and they are entitled to, and it is just and equitable that they should receive, redundancy payments as follows:a. Mrs J Cammish, the sum of £498.75;b. Ms H Maughan, the sum of £1,135.78;c. Miss L Langhorn, the sum of £459.00; Case Number: 3312533/2020 3312900/2020 3314008/2020 3314435/2020 3313238/2020 2d. Ms N Webb, the sum of £1,823.08; ande. Miss C Poole, the sum of £310.00. 23 March 2022