Ms T R Correia Da Silva v CR Bedford Ltd: 3312232/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]CR Bedford Ltd is added as a respondent in substitution for Coffee Republic in these proceedings under Rule 34 of the Rules of Procedure 2013.[2]The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is not well-founded. The respondent did not make an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.[3]The complaint in respect of holiday pay is well-founded. The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken on the date the claimant’s employment ended. The respondent shall pay the claimant £746.30. The claimant is responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance.[4]The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is not wellfounded. The claimant is not entitled to notice pay.[5]When the proceedings were begun the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. There are no exceptional circumstances that make an award of an amount equal to two weeks’ gross pay unjust or inequitable. The respondent shall pay the claimant £924. 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February Case No: 3312232/2023