Miss B-M Bliss v Floorspan Contracts Ltd: 3311199/2023

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS

Case No 3311199/2023

Between

Miss B-M BlissClaimant

Floorspan Contracts LimitedRespondent

Before

Employment Judge Gordon Walker

Mr McConbie (instructed by counsel) for respondent

Date 20 January 2026

JUDGMENT

[1]The claim of harassment related to age (sections 26 and 39(2) Equality Act 2010) in relation to the allegations at paragraphs 9, 15 and 16 of the particulars of claim is well founded and succeeds. The claims were presented within the time limit at section 123(2)(b) Equality Act 2010.

[2]All other claims of harassment related to age (sections 26 and 39(2) Equality Act 2010) are not well founded and are dismissed.

[3]The claim of direct age discrimination (sections 13 and 39(2) Equality Act 2010) in relation to the allegations at paragraphs 7 and 19 of the particulars of claim is well founded and succeeds. The claims were presented within the time limit at section 123(2)(b) Equality Act 2010.

[4]All other claims of direct age discrimination (sections 13 and 39(2) Equality Act 2010) are not well founded and are dismissed. Case No: 3311199/2023

[5]The claim of victimisation (sections 27 and 39(2) Equality Act 2010) is not well founded and is dismissed.

[6]The claim of breach of contract (notice period) is well founded and succeeds.

[7]The claim for holiday pay is dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. Approved by: