Mr C Heath and Mr M Bartlett v 1066 Capital Ltd T/a Crystal Press: 3310690/2024 and 3310691/2024
JUDGMENT
[1]The claim was presented in the South-East Employment Tribunal on 20th September 2024. The Respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The claim succeeds and the remedy to which the Claimants are entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. Approved by: Employment Judge Alliott 15th May 2025[1]On the 15th May 2025 Employment Judge Alliott decided that the claims by Mr Heath and Mr Bartlett were successful under rule 22 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024.[2]Mr Bartlett was unfairly dismissed and is awarded a basic award of £21,000.00. The claimant is awarded £60,442.97 as compensatory award, £333.26 for loss of pension and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The award is not uplifted for breach of ACAS codes. Mr Bartlett is entitled to a redundancy payment, however, in the light of the Basic Award I make no separate award for this claim.[3]Mr Bartlett’s claims for notice pay and failure to provide a written itemised pay slip as required by s8 Employment Rights Act 1996 are successful and I award £11,588.04 and £1400 respectively for each claim.[4]Mr Heath was unfairly dismissed and is awarded a basic award of £16,251.30. The claimant is awarded £62,269.05 as compensatory award, £164.88 for loss of pension and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The award is not uplifted for breach of ACAS codes. Mr Heath is entitled to a redundancy payment, however, in the light of the Basic Award I make no separate award for this claim.[5]Mr Heath’s claims for notice pay, failure to provide a written itemised pay slip as required by s8 Employment Rights Act 1996 and unpaid annual leave are successful. I award £6,497.64, £1,082.94 and £2,156.01 respectively for each claim.[6]All figures are gross figures and subject to tax and national insurance. Case No: 3310690/24 and 3310691/24 Approved by