W C Akaigwe v Times PBS Ltd: 3309060/2024
JUDGMENT
[1]The claim was presented in the South-East Employment Tribunal on 18th June 2024. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of part of the claim, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent must pay the claimant £1,231.75 in unpaid sick pay. Approved by: Employment Judge Alliott 31st January 2025[1]The claim of detriment for having made protected disclosures was not presented within the applicable time limit. It was reasonably practicable to do so. The claim of detriment for having made protected disclosures is therefore dismissed.[2]The claim of unlawful deduction from wages was not presented within the applicable time limit. It was reasonably practicable to do so. The claim of unlawful deduction from wages is therefore dismissed.[3]The claim of sex discrimination was not presented within the applicable time limit. It is not just and equitable to extend the time limit. The claim of sex discrimination is therefore dismissed. Approved by: