Ms G Luca v Sugarman Health and Wellbeing Ltd: 3308158/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]The following complaints of pregnancy/maternity discrimination are wellfounded and succeed: 1.1. [Issue 2.1.1] The claimant, having requested a change of responsibilities on 19th July 2022, was informed that it was the claimant’s circumstances that had changed and therefore it was her problem. 1.2. [Issue 2.1.5] The respondent failed to take any action upon or investigate the claimant’s grievance letter dated 10th July 2023. 1.3. [Issue 2.1.6] The respondent failed to provide any outcome in relation to the grievance letter dated 10th July 2023.[2]The remaining complaints of pregnancy/maternity discrimination are not wellfounded and are dismissed.[3]The complaint in respect of holiday pay is not well well-founded and is dismissed. The respondent did not fail to pay the claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998.[4]The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is not well-founded and is dismissed.[5]When the proceedings were begun the respondent was not in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. Case No: 3308158/2023[6]Remedy will be decided at a hearing on 20 March 2026, by CVP, time estimate one day. Evidence on which the claimant will rely must be provided to the respondent by 6 February 2026. Evidence (if any) on which the respondent will rely must be provided to the claimant by 20 February 2026. NOTE: Point 5 above reflects the oral judgment given by the Tribunal upon a reconsideration, under rule 68, of the decision which had originally been announced, shortly after that original decision had been announced. The Tribunal has indicated that it will hear further argument about that reconsideration, should either of the parties wish to pursue it, at the next hearing. Approved by: