Mr T Hunkin v Pronto Ecom Ltd (Formerly Kemp Electrical Ltd): 3307842/2023
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £8416.00.[2]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £8416.00. . _____________________________ Employment Judge R Lewis Date: 21/2/2024REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 17 April 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because:• it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Hutchings Date: 24 June 2025[1]On 2 October 2024 the parties were informed by letter that I had reconsidered and revoked the judgment of my former colleague Employment Judge Lewis, since it named the wrong respondent. (My reasons for doing so were set out in that letter and in an earlier letter/orders of 19 July 2024.) Unfortunately, I neglected to issue a judgment formally confirming the revocation; my apologies for this oversight. The matter having been bought recently to my attention, I now issue this judgment.[2]This judgment has no effect upon the later progress of the claim (which was amended so as to be against a different respondent and some time thereafter struck out). Approved by: