Mrs N Fehri v Ist Metropolitan Locksmiths Ltd: 3307198/2018

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3307198/2018
Mrs N FehriClaimantIst Metropolitan Locksmiths LtdRespondent
Employment Judge ManleyIn person for claimantMr Von Cossel - In attendance but not party to for respondentDate 3 October 2018

JUDGMENT

[1]The complaints of pregnancy and/or sex discrimination and unlawful deduction of wages as set out in the claim form are declared to be well-founded.[2]Any remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Hearing for which two hours have been allocated at 10am on Thursday 13 September 2018 at Watford Employment Tribunal, 51 Clarendon Road, Watford, WD17 1HP.[3]The claimant must prepare a schedule of the sums claimed and a bundle of documents relating to any remedy claimed. Dated 22/8/18 …………..………………………………...… Employment Judge Manley, Watford .................................................................. Judgment sent to the parties on …............................................................... For Secretary of the Tribunals Case Number: 3307198/2018 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mrs N Fehri v 1st Metropolitan Locksmiths Ltd Heard at: Watford On: 13 September 2018 Before: Employment Judge Henry Appearances For the Claimant: In Person For the Respondent: Mr Von Cossel - In attendance but not party to proceedings[1]On default judgment having been entered on the respondent having failed to present a response within the requisite time period, and[2]On the claimant advising the Tribunal that the sum in respect of annual leave outstanding at the time of termination was paid by the respondent on or around the 16 June 2018, and[3]On correspondence submitted on behalf of the claimant showing that payment had not been made prior to this date, on the respondent seeking to clarify the claimant’s entitlement to annual leave with the claimant, for which there is no evidence that it was predicated on the claimant’s pregnancy or otherwise maternity leave,[4]The Tribunal makes no award in respect of discrimination on those grounds.[5]The Tribunal makes no award for compensation or otherwise injury to feelings.