Miss V Stanyon v Complete Contracts Ltd: 3306532/2024 and 3306535/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3306532/2024, 3306535/2024
Miss V StanyonClaimantComplete Contracts LtdRespondent
Employment Judge QuillDate 25 April 2025

JUDGMENT

[1]The claim was presented in the South East Employment Tribunal on 10th July 2024. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £9448.20.[3]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £1224.07.[4]Other claims will be decided in due course. Approved by: Employment Judge Quill 31 March 2025[1]The claim was presented in the South East Employment Tribunal on 10th July 2024. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £9448.20.[3]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £1224.07.[4]Other claims will be decided in due course. Approved by:[1]This judgment is in addition to and not instead of the judgment sent to parties on 17 April 2025 and it finally disposes of the complaints under each of the above case numbers..[2]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £70.18. This is because the Respondent purported to deduct that amount as a pension contribution but did not pay that to the pension provider.[3]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £245.20. This is because the Respondent purported to deduct that amount as PAYE but did not pay that to HMRC.[4]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £98.13. This is because the Respondent purported to deduct that amount as employee’s national insurance contribution but did not pay that to HMRC.[5]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. She was entitled to 12 weeks notice, and did not receive any notice or payment in lieu of notice. The respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £5,153.73. Approved by: