Miss E Bowler v I.S.O.D. Ltd and others: 3306442/2019

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3306442/2019
Miss E BowlerClaimant(1) I.SO.D. Limited (2) Sasi Shiri (3) Ivhak HebyRespondent
Employment Judge GeorgeMs Bilbao (instructed by Solicitor) for claimantNot in attendance for respondentDate 14 December 2020

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claims of automatically unfair dismissal (contrary to s.99 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and/or reg. 20 of the Maternity and Paternity Leave Regulations 1999), unfavourable treatment because of pregnancy (contrary to s.18 of the Equality Act 2010) and sex discrimination (contrary to s.13 of the Equality Act 2010) succeed as against the second and third respondents and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at the Final Hearing. The second and third respondents will only be entitled to take part in this hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Tribunal who hears the case.[2]The claims proceed against the first respondent.[3]The claims are listed for a Final Hearing on 18 & 19 May 2020. Employment Judge George _____________________________ Date: 19 November 2019