Miss T K Petts v Texas Barbers and others: 3305952/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The third respondent (CB Norbury Limited) has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £450. Employment Judge Anstis Date: 2 July 2024[2]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 20/08/2024 AND ENTERED IN THE REGISTER FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 3305952/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss T K Petts Respondenst: Texas Barbers(1) Norman Asso(2) CB Norbury Limited(3) Hawzhin Mohammed Hussein(4) [4]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The third respondent (CB Norbury Limited) has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £450. Employment Judge Anstis Date: 2 July 2024[5]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 20/08/2024 AND ENTERED IN THE REGISTER FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 3305952/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss T K Petts Respondenst: Texas Barbers(1) Norman Asso(2) CB Norbury Limited(3) Hawzhin Mohammed Hussein(4) [7]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The third respondent (CB Norbury Limited) has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £450.