Miss K Stockton v Care mithra: 3305623/2024
JUDGMENT
The complaint of Redundancy Payment is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 28 August 2024 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of Redundancy Payment should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 28 August 2024. it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of Redundancy Payment is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Graham 23 January 2025[1]The claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 4 June 2024. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £1,326.08 gross.[3]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £663.52.[4]The respondent must pay the claimant £1,989.60 in total. Approved by: