I Rogers v Marlow Education Trust: 3305359/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3305359/2024
Isobel RogersClaimantMarlow Education Trust RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARINGRespondent
Employment Judge HutchingsIn person for claimantMs Hornblower (instructed by counsel) for respondentMrs Hornblower (instructed by counsel) for respondentDate 2 December 2025

JUDGMENT

[1]The complaint of disability discrimination by association is dismissed.[2]The reason for dismissing this complaint is that the claimant confirmed several times at the hearing on 22 May 2025 that in her claims of disability discrimination (alleged conduct by the respondent against her as the claimant) she is relying on her disability and not her daughter disabilities as the reason she says the alleged behaviour was related to disability. Therefore I concluded that the alleged behaviour against the claimant was not related to her daughter’s disabilities. The claimant’s remaining claim(s) will proceed to hearing on 5 April 2027. 6 April 2027, 7 April 2027, 8 April 2027, 9 April 2027, 12 April 2027, 13 April 2027, 14 April 2027, 15 April 2027, 16 April 2027, 19 April 2027, 20 April 2027, 21 April 2027, 22 April 2027 and 23 April 2027. Approved by: Employment Judge Hutchings 22 May 2025 SENT TO THE PARTIES ON: 27/06/2025 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 3305359/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs I Rogers Respondent: Marlow Education Trust Heard at: Watford Tribunal On: 12 September 2025 Before: Employment Judge Cowen Representation Claimant: Mrs Rogers (in person) Respondent: Mrs Hornblower (counsel)[1]The claim of victimisation contrary to section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 on the grounds the respondent removed the claimant from the SEN drive on 11 October 2023 is struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it has no reasonable prospect of success.[2]The claim of victimisation contrary to section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 on the grounds that the claimant was excluded from the birthday celebrations in September 2023 is struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it has no reasonable prospect of success.[3]The claim of whistleblowing detriment on the grounds the respondent removed the claimant from the SEN drive on 11 October 2023 is not struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) and shall proceed to a final hearing. Approved by: