Mr T Riley v Aurachain UK Ltd: 3305246/2023
JUDGMENT
The response is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 12 September 2024 the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because:• the respondent had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 4th October 2023 to provide the necessary documents for the hearing bundle.[2]The respondent has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The response is therefore struck out.[3]The respondent will be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal but will only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.[4]The final hearing will be converted to a 1-day Remedy Hearing. _____________________________ Employment Judge French 24/9/2024[1]The claimant’s claims for direct discrimination, harassment, victimisation, unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract succeed.[2]The claimant’s claim for indirect discrimination is dismissed.[3]The respondent shall pay to the claimant the total sum of £186,229.87 comprising the following: 3.1. £3,800 in respect of breach of contract; 3.2. £1,179.56 in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages; 3.3. £44,231,10 financial losses (loss of earnings); 3.4. £33,700 injury to feelings; 3.5. £15,586.22 20% ACAS uplift; 3.6. £17,429.54 interest 3.7. £70,303.45 grossing up to compensate for taxation;