Miss A Dolecka v A Gryson: 3304910/2023
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.REASONS
[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint or claim a redundancy payment.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complains should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaints of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgement.[1]The claim was issued in the Watford Employment Tribunals on 17 May 2023. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The Tribunal declares the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The respondent is ordered to pay the claimant:a. In relation to 13 days unpaid wages, the gross sum of £936b. In relation to 2 weeks unpaid holiday pay, the gross sum of £750[3]The respondent is in breach of contract by failing to reimburse the claimant agreed expenses and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £94.02.