Ms V Tait v J Rubython: 3303898/2023
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out.REASONS
[1]Claimant’s email of 7 April 2024 does not address Employment Judge Tynan’s Letter to claimant dated 10 April 2024. The tribunal cannot give advice, as requested by claimant in their 7 April 2024 email. Accordingly, in the absence of any substantial response the claim is struck out for not being actively pursued. Approved by: Employment Judge Hutchings Date: 29 April 2025[2]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 14 May 2025 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 3303898/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms V Tait Respondent: James Rubython[5]Claimant’s email of 7 April 2024 does not address Employment Judge Tynan’s Letter to claimant dated 10 April 2024. The tribunal cannot give advice, as requested by claimant in their 7 April 2024 email. Accordingly, in the absence of any substantial response the claim is struck out for not being actively pursued. Approved by: Employment Judge Hutchings Date: 29 April 2025[6]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 14 May 2025 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 3303898/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms V Tait Respondent: James Rubython[9]Claimant’s email of 7 April 2024 does not address Employment Judge Tynan’s Letter to claimant dated 10 April 2024. The tribunal cannot give advice, as requested by claimant in their 7 April 2024 email. Accordingly, in the absence of any substantial response the claim is struck out for not being actively pursued. Approved by: