Mr T Alexander v London Borough of Islington: 3303812/2023
JUDGMENT
RULE 51 The application for reconsideration of the judgment of 25 April 2024, which dismissed various complaints upon withdrawal, is refused under rules 69 and 70(2). The application was made more than 14 days after the judgment was sent to the parties and it is not in the interests of justice to extend time. In any case, there is no reasonable prospect of the judgment being varied or revoked. Approved by: Employment Judge Dick 12 November 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON .28 November 2025................................ .......................................... FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 3303812/2023 Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employmenttribunal- decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here: www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/employment-rules-and-legislationpractice- directions/ Claim No: 3303812/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr. T. Alexander The London Borough of Islington Heard at: Watford Employment Tribunal (via CVP) On: 16, 17 and 18 February 2026 Before: Employment Judge Douse (Sitting alone) Appearances For the claimant: In person For the respondent: Ms S. King, Counsel JUDGMENT[1]The Claimant was fairly dismissed by reason of capability.[2]The Claimant’s claim for unfair dismissal therefore fails. APPROVED BY: