Miss D El Magowry v Tunku Ousmand: 3303529/2019

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3303529/2019
Miss D El MagowryClaimantTunku OusmandRespondent
Employment Judge HenryDate 11 December 2019

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 On the Respondent having failed to enter a response to the Claimant’s claim pursuant to Rule 21, judgment is entered for the claimant. The remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. Employment Judge Henry _____________________________ Date: 10.09.19 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON ………27.09.19……………………………… AND ENTERED IN THE REGISTER ………………………………………………… FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No.3303529/19 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS BETWEEN Claimant and Respondent Miss D El Magowry Tunku Ousmand The time for presenting a response having expired and no response having been presented, Employment Judge Manley makes the following DEFAULT JUDGMENT LIABILITY AND REMEDY[1]The complaints of unpaid wages, holiday pay and notice pay as set out in the claim form are declared to be well-founded.[2]The respondent is ordered to pay the following sums to the claimant 1 Unpaid wages £2833.31 2 2 days holiday pay £354.16 3 1 weeks notice £885.41 Total £4072.88[3]The hearing on 9 August 2016 is vacated. Dated 11.12.19 …………..………………………………...…