Miss E Thomas v N Chapman and others: 3302858/2018

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3302858/2018
Miss Elaine ThomasClaimantNigel Chapman (1) Sue Gates (2) Family Solutions (3) Pauline Roberts (4)Respondent
Employment Judge HenryMr N BoustredMs A MoriartyIn person for claimantMr T Wilding (instructed by counsel) for respondentDate 5 August 2022

JUDGMENT

The claim against the respondents are dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. It is recorded that the claimant’s claim against the London Borough of Brent continues. _____________________________ Employment Judge Henry Date: 22/1/19 Judgment sent to the parties on Date:28/1/19 _____________________________ For the Tribunal office Case Number: 3302858/2018 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss Elaine Thomas Respondents: The London Borough of Brent Heard: Watford Hearing Centre On: 20 & 21 July 2022 and 5 August 2022 Before: Employment Judge G Tobin Members: Mr N Boustred Ms A Moriarty Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr T Wilding (counsel) JUDGMENT It is the unanimous decision of the Employment Tribunal that:[1]At all material times, the claimant was a disabled person, pursuant to s6 Equality Act 2010.[2]The respondent did not breach it duty to make reasonable adjustments under s20 Equality Act 2010, so as to be in breach of s21 Equality Act 2010.[3]The case being concluded, proceedings are accordingly dismissed.