Ms S Madhoo v Fortune Green Practice (a Firm): 3302755/2022
JUDGMENT
This has been a remote hearing not objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was CVP. A fully face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and the purposes of the hearing could all be achieved remotely.[1]The claimant was not employed by the respondent under a contract of employment.[2]The claims of unfair dismissal, for a redundancy payment and for breach of contract/notice pay are not well founded and are dismissed.[3]The claimant was a worker of the respondent within the meaning of s.230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.