Miss R Henry v LHR Airports Ltd: 3301257/2021
JUDGMENT
All elements of the claimant’s claim are dismissed except for a complaint that being repeatedly asked during an attendance meeting on either 17 or 22 February 2021 about who she had made disclosures to and what those disclosures were amounted to a detriment or detriments on grounds that she had made a protected disclosure(s). The protected disclosure(s) in question are said to be contained in the section of an email of 24 September 2020, subsequently repeated to the CAA on 20 October 2020, between (and including) “This has now resulted in …” and “… when being deployed” (and not in any other part of that email).REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 31st January 2023 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted by or on behalf of the claimant has been scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious; the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 1st December 2022; it has not been actively pursued; and it is no longer possible to have a fair hearing of the claim on 6-7 February 2023.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.[3]The hearing fixed for 6 – 7 February 2023 will not take place.