Mr T King v Eleciserve E & M Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation): 3300533/2024 Mr T King v Eleciserve E & M Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation): 3300533/2024
JUDGMENT
The claim for a remedy following judgment for the Claimant under rule 22 is dismissed as it is not being actively pursued.REASONS
[1]This hearing was listed as a remedy hearing following a rule 22 judgment. The Claimant did not attend. I instructed the clerk to contact the Claimant to ascertain whether he intended to attend. The Claimant said he was at work and would not be attending although it was clear he was aware of the hearing.[2]Mr Monagh helpfully attended the hearing and was able to confirm that the financial claims made by the Claimant which were capable of being settled by the Secretary of State had been settled and there would be no dividend arising out of the liquidation to settle any further judgments.[3]I did not find the Claimant’s explanation for his non-attendance to be satisfactory especially since he took no steps to advise the Tribunal he would not be attending the hearing. Further, he had not provided a schedule of loss Case No: 3300533/2024 showing what his claims were and how they had been calculated. Accordingly, he is not actively pursuing his claim for a remedy and it is appropriate to dismiss it.