A Constantinou v Wealden Leisure Ltd T/a Freedom Leisure: 3300531/2025

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3300531/2025
A ConstantinouClaimantWealden Leisure Ltd T/a Freedom LeisureRespondent
Employment Judge AnnandIn person for claimantMs Cho (instructed by Counsel) for respondentDate 3 February 2026

JUDGMENT

[1]The response to the complaints of harassment is not struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c) because the respondent has not complied with a Tribunal order and is not struck out under Rule 38(1)(a) because it has no reasonable prospect of success.[2]The complaint of harassment related to age is well-founded and succeeds.[3]The complaint of harassment related to race is not well-founded and is dismissed.[4]The claim of harassment related to age was not presented within the applicable time limit, but it is just and equitable to extend the time limit. Remedy[5]The respondent shall pay the claimant the following sums: a) Compensation for injury to feelings: £2,000 b) Interest on compensation for injury to feelings £340.16 calculated in accordance with the Employment 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February Case No: 3300531/2025 Tribunals (Interest on Awards in Discrimination Cases) Regulations 1996: Approved by