Mr M J Allan v What Tankers Ltd and Bottledock International Ltd: 3300450/2019
JUDGMENT
The response is struck out.REASONS
[1]By an order dated 17 August 2020 the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The respondent has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.[3]A hearing to consider what remedy should be provided to the claimant will be listed on a date to be fixed and notified to the parties. The remedy hearing will have a time allocation of 1 hour and is suitable for hearing by CVP. _____________________________ Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto 24/11/2020[1]The claimant was an employee of the first respondent from 7 December 2017 to 5 August 2018. His service with the first respondent was continuous with his employment with the second respondent from 1 May 2016 to 6 December 2017.[2]The first respondent is ordered to pay the claimant: 2.1. £14,897.49 in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages during the period 21 November 2016 to 5 August 2018; 2.2. £1,918.08 in respect of pay for accrued but untaken holiday; 2.3. A basic award of £1,010; and 2.4. A compensatory award of £21,409.70.[3]The figure at 2.2 is the gross sum. If the respondent pays the tax and national insurance due to HMRC on that payment, payment of the net amount will meet the judgment debt. The figures at 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4 are net sums which must be paid to the claimant in full.