Mr S Alsulahat v Harlington School: 3300096/2024
JUDGMENT
[1]The Respondent’s application to strike out all or part of the claim is dismissed. Approved by Employment Judge Hunt Date: 27 February 2025 Sent to the parties on: 21 March 2025 ............................................................ For the Tribunal Office . Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing and written reasons not having been requested, written reasons will not be provided unless a request is made by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.[2]Case No: 3300096/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr S Alsulahat Respondent: Harlington School[4]The claims of discrimination because of race and of harassment related to race are struck out.REASONS
[1]The claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £750 following a preliminary hearing held on 27 February 2025.[2]The Order was sent to the claimant on 21 March 2025.[3]The claimant has failed to pay this deposit. His email of 7 May 2025 confirmed his stance on the matter.[4]The complaints itemised at paragraphs 3 and 4 of list of issues within the case summary sent to parties on 21 March 2025 are therefore struck out under rule 40(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024.[5]Notice of hearing for the remaining complaints will be sent in due course. Employment Judge QUILL Approved: 17 June 2025[1]The claim of a breach of the right to be accompanied afforded by section 10 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 does not succeed and is dismissed.[2]The claim for unpaid wages in the form of holiday pay, made under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA 1996”), does not succeed and is dismissed.[3]The claim under section 23 of the ERA 1996 for unpaid lunchtime duty payments succeeds in that the claimant is owed 5 lunchtime payments of £15 each gross, i.e. in total £75 before the deduction of income tax.[4]The claim under section 23 of the ERA 1996 for 6 hours of overtime payments succeeds. The claimant is owed £137.16 gross in that regard. Approved by