Ms D Cheung v Clarity Products Ltd: 3212850/2020
JUDGMENT
The response is struck out.REASONS
[1]Following the Preliminary Hearing on the 17th May 2021 the summary sent to parties on the 19th May 2021 gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The respondent has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The response is therefore struck out.[3]The respondent will be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal but will only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. Employment Judge Taylor 21 September 2021 Case Number: 3212850/2020 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Diane Cheung Respondent: Clarity Products Ltd Heard at: East London Hearing Centre (by Cloud Video Platform) On: 8 December 2021 Before: Employment Judge Housego Representation Claimant: Grant Williams, Community Trade Union Respondent: No attendance[1]The Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant a redundancy payment of £2,152.00.[2]The Respondent made unlawful deductions from the pay of the Claimant of £6,660.83 (contrary to S13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996), and is ordered to pay that sum to the Claimant.[3]The Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant £1,680.77 outstanding holiday pay.[1]A full ex tempore judgment was given on the day of the hearing and the reasons were given in that judgment.[2]In summary, the Claimant was dismissed as redundant, but not paid her redundancy payment. The Respondent admitted that they had not paid it. There is no dispute over the figure. Case Number: 3212850/2020[3]The Respondent filed a response to the claim, admitting that they had not paid £6,660.83 in wages.[4]The Claimant’s last payslip showed the holiday pay due of £1,660.77, but the money was not paid to the Claimant.