Miss R Jain v Veolia ES (UK) Ltd: 3206090/2021
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant’s complaints of holiday pay and notice pay having been withdrawn by the claimant, are dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.[2]The claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal is not well-founded, and it is hereby dismissed.[3]The claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal pursuant to section 103 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is not well- founded and it is hereby dismissed.[4]The claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal pursuant to section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 is not well- founded and it is hereby dismissed.[5]The claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal pursuant to section 152 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 is not wellfounded and it is hereby dismissed. - 1 - Case Number: 3206090/2021[6]The claimant’s complaint of direct race discrimination pursuant to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 is not well-founded and it is hereby dismissed.[7]The claimant’s complaint of harassment related to race pursuant to section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 is not well- founded and it is hereby dismissed.[8]The claimant’s complaint of direct sex discrimination pursuant to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 is not well-founded and it is hereby dismissed.[9]The claimant’s complaint of harassment related to sex pursuant to section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 is not well- founded and it is hereby dismissed.[10]The claimant’s complaints of unauthorised deductions of wages pursuant to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and breach of contract in respect of commission payments are not well-founded and they are hereby dismissed.[11]The claimant’s complaints of unauthorised deductions of wages pursuant to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and breach of contract in respect of expenses payments are not well-founded and they are hereby dismissed.