Ms R Khatun v UC Franchising Ltd: 3205532/2022
JUDGMENT
[1]Pursuant to Rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 in view of the non-attendance of both parties I hereby DISMISS all the claims.[2]I confirm that I have considered all the information available to me. It is not possible to proceed with the hearing in the absence of further information from the Claimant. The Claimant was telephoned on the number supplied and reasonable steps were taken to enquire about the reason for her absence but no answer was obtained.