Mr H Gamit v Loomis UK Ltd: 3205121/2021
JUDGMENT
[1]The Claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages is not wellfounded. The Respondent paid to the Claimant the wages that were properly payable to him. The Claimant’s claim for payment of accrued holiday pay upon termination is also not well-founded. The Claimant’s wrongful dismissal claim is not well-founded. The Respondent gave one week’s notice of termination and this period of notice was paid. Employment Judge Overton Dated: 26 January 2022[2]Case Number: 3205121/2021 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr H Gamit Respondent: Loomis UK Limited NOTICE OF CORRECTION EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS RULES OF PROCEDURE 2013 Under the provisions of Rule 69 I hereby correct the clerical mistakes in the Judgment herein sent to the parties on 28 January 2022 by replacing “not well-founded” with “not-well founded and is dismissed”. Tribunal Judge Overton acting as an Employment Judge Dated: 3 March 2022[3]Case Number: 3205121/2021 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr H Gamit Respondent: Loomis UK Limited Heard at: East London Hearing Centre On: 13 January 2022 Before: Tribunal Judge Overton Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr J Symons, Actons Solicitors CORRECTED JUDGMENT The Claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages is not well-founded and is dismissed. The Respondent paid to the Claimant the wages that were properly payable to him. The Claimant’s claim for payment of accrued holiday pay upon termination is also not well-founded and is dismissed. The Claimant’s wrongful dismissal claim is not well-founded and is dismissed. The Respondent gave one week’s notice of termination and this period of notice was paid. Tribunal Judge Overton acting as an