Miss N Gibson and others v PARC (Essex) Ltd: 3203961/2022 and others
JUDGMENT
[1]The Claimant’s claims succeed only to the extent set out in paragraphs 16 - 36 below, in relation to the following:1.1 unfair dismissal,1.2 a redundancy payment,1.3 protective award for failure to consult,1.4 breach of contract,1.5 unpaid holiday pay,1.6 pay in lieu of notice,1.7 unauthorised deductions from wages.[2]Ms Frearson’s (case number 3204407/2022) claim for maternity pay succeeds.[3]The Respondent is ordered to pay to each claimant the total sums as set out in paragraphs 16 - 36 below.REASONS
[1]By various claim forms presented on different dates between 23 June 2022 and 29 July 2023 the 21 claimants brought claims for unfair dismissal, for a redundancy payment, protective award for failure to consult, breach of contract, unpaid holiday pay, pay in lieu of notice, and unauthorised deductions from wages. Ms Frearson also claimed for unpaid maternity pay. In summary, on 16 June 2022 the Respondent said that there was a funding issue which meant that it had to cease its operations with immediate effect and that, as a result, the Claimants would not be paid and would no longer have jobs. No formal notice of dismissal was given and the Claimants did not receive P45 payslips. Initially the Respondent’s case was that it had insufficient funds to pay the Claimants, but it denied dismissal averring that the Claimants had all chosen to no longer work for the Respondent.[2]At a preliminary hearing on 17 November 2022, Mr McCann representing the Respondent as a trustee, said that the Respondent was currently preparing papers to put the company into voluntary liquidation. Miss Stewart and Miss Dodge were identified as the lead Claimants who would have responsibility to coordinate filing of the bundles, indexes, and the schedules of loss from each of the Claimants for the final hearing. The matter was listed for a one-day hearing on 28 February 2023. The tribunal is grateful to both Miss Stewart and Miss Dodge for their assistance in quantifying the individual claims in this case. The tribunal hopes that this judgment provides the basis for the Claimants to seek redress through the appropriate government agencies.The hearing
[3]At the hearing on 28 February 2023, Miss Stewart and Miss Dodge attended in person. Eleven of the remaining 19 Claimants attended via CVP. Mr McCann, representing the Respondents as a trustee, attended via CVP. Mr McCann confirmed that the Respondent had lost its funding for its operation, and that the Respondent now accepted that the entire workforce, including all of the Claimants, had been made redundant due to the Respondent having ceased to operate due to loss of funding.[4]Mr McCann expressed sympathy for the Claimants and said that the Respondent did not seek to challenge the Claimants right to payments for redundancy, unpaid wages and all other related claims and that, secondly, the Respondent did not challenge the sum of any such payments that the tribunal considered were awardable. Mr McCann said that, from mid-May until mid-June 2022, the Claimants had not been paid any wages as would have been their normal entitlement having worked for the Respondent during this period. Mr McCann also said that he would not take any issue with any of the annual leave figures, sums claimed for outstanding holiday pay, or pay in lieu of notice claimed by the Claimants. He also informed the tribunal that the Respondent would not disagree with any of the claims made by those Claimants who were unable to attend the hearing either in person or by CVP. It was agreed by the Respondent, that the Claimants would review their claim figures in terms of entitlement and accuracy and inform the tribunal of the sums that they believed they were each due. Mr McCann was to be copied into all the correspondence sent to the tribunal and was to inform the tribunal if he had any objections to the claims. He did not raise any objections. The tribunal reconvened on 27 March and 11 April 2023 to decide on remedy. The basis for the tribunal’s calculations on remedy[5]Unfair dismissal: the following formula was used:(a) (A) Basic award (years worked x net weekly wage) less redundancy award (where applicable) (increased by 5% s 124 ERA in relation to failure to provide last wage slip)(b) (B) Prescribed element: loss of wages to date of assessment (net average wage per week from 16 June 2022 to 28 February 2023, plus 5% uplift under Section 12A ERA, less any earnings from new employment (where applicable), payment in lieu of notice and recoupment of benefits (where stated).(c) (C) Non-prescribed element: awarded loss of statutory rights (£400 to each claimant) and loss of pensions rights (where provided) increased by 5% s 124 ERA in relation to failure to follow ACAS Codes of Practice)(d) (D) Additional award: breach of re-employment orders not applicable.[6]Redundancy payments: these were calculated based on each Claimant’s total (complete) years of service multiplied by the gross weekly wage, adjusted to the relevant age criteria. The government’s redundancy calculator was then used to determine the final figure based on the information provided to the tribunal by the Claimants.[7]Protective award for failure to consult: We have awarded a sum equivalent to one week’s pay for each week of the protected period of 90 days (12 weeks), each of the Claimants who were entitled to claim this award by virtue of having two years’ continuous employment.[8]Breach of contract: We have made no separate award to any of the claimants for breach of contract as any losses recoverable under this head of loss are covered within the awards (where applicable) for holiday pay, payment in lieu of notice, unpaid wages and maternity pay.[9]Unpaid wages: it was agreed by the Respondents that none of the claimants had been paid wages for a period of four weeks before the company ceased to operate on 16 June. The tribunal awarded each Claimant four-weeks of their gross weekly wage.[10]Holiday pay: the tribunal used the information submitted by the Claimants in relation to their holiday pay claims. Where such information was not provided by the individual Claimants, the tribunal has not been in a position to make any award. While some Claimants made claims for holiday pay after 16 June 2022, the tribunal did not award any holiday pay beyond that date as the Respondent had ceased to operate and no-one was working for it.[11]Pay in lieu of notice: The tribunal did not have access to the contracts of all 21 claimants. The Respondent agreed, and the tribunal accepted, that the amount of notice pay claimed by each Claimant would be accepted and, where that was not specified, the tribunal would calculate the pay in lieu of notice as one week for each year’s service.[12]We have worked with the information we have been provided with to the best of our ability, and have attempted to be just and equitable in all cases. We were also minded that the Respondent did not challenge the validity or accuracy of any of the claims submitted by the Claimants.[13]A number of Claimants claimed loss of earnings from termination of their contracts (16 June 2022) until the date of the hearing (28 February 2023). As this is a redundancy due to the employer ceasing to operate, we did not allow any claims for loss of earnings past the date when the Respondent ceased to operate.[14]All calculations in relation to unpaid wages, holiday pay, and pay in lieu of notice have been calculated as a gross sum as the claimants will be liable for tax on those elements of their claims.[15]The respective Claimant’s claims are calculated in alphabetical order, as set out below. These are the tribunal’s unanimous findings. The Remedy Calculations[16]Tierney Butcher (Case number 3203994/2022) Unfair dismissal(a) (A) £0 plus(b) (B) £1418.50 plus(c) (C) £420 = £1838.50 Redundancy pay (4 years x £50 gross weekly wages (under 21)) £200 Protective award for failure to consult £1036.00 Unpaid wages £413.10 Holiday pay not specified and no award made) Notice pay (4 weeks @£50) £200 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £3687.60[17]Suzanne Dodge (Case number 3204540/2022) Unfair dismissal () £0.00 + £0.00 + £477.63 = £477.63 Redundancy pay (7 years x £299 gross weekly pay) £2093 Protective award for failure to consult: £1723.38 Unpaid wages £1148.92 Holiday pay £631.75 Notice Pay (7 weeks x £299) £2093 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £8167.68[18]Jayne Dow (Case number 3204411/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £6542.56 + £420 = £6962.25 Redundancy Pay (7 years x £232.75) £2443.88 Protective award for failure to consult: £1301.17 Unpaid wages (£232.75 gross weekly wage x 4) £931 Holiday pay £1555.15 Notice pay (5 weeks x £232.75) £1163.75 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £14357.20[19]Layla Earley (Case number 3204150/2022) Unfair dismissal (£0.00 + £2987.25 +£525.00 = £3512.25. Redundancy Pay (7 years x £152) £912 Protective award for failure to consult: £1868.84 Unpaid wages (£152 x 4) £1216 Holiday pay £250.80 Notice pay £12.16 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £7772.05[20]Emma Frearson (Case number 3204407/2022) Unfair dismissal ((0.00 + £7629.30 + £617.85 = £8247.15 Redundancy Pay (8 years x £382.50) £3060 Protective award for failure to consult: £972.00 Unpaid wages (£382.50 x 4) £1530 Outstanding Maternity pay £380.46 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £18320.61[21]Chris Frisbee (Case number 3203978/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £1204.49 + £581.11= £1785.60 Redundancy Pay (4 weeks x £365.96) £1463.84 Protective award for failure to consult: £2272.00 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £365.96) £1463.84 Holiday pay £826.25 Notice pay £1463.84 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £9275.37[22]Niamh Gibson (Case number 3203961/2022) Unfair dismissal (£0.00 + £0.00 + £634.20 = £634.20 Redundancy Pay (5 weeks x £356.25) £1068.75 Protective award for failure to consult: £2054.47 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £356.25) £1425 Holiday pay £1068.75 Notice pay £1781.25 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £8032.42[23]Georgia Gray (Case number 3203971/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £5636.83 + £670.99 = £6307.82 Redundancy Pay (6 weeks x £345) £1035 Protective award for failure to consult: £2267.28 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x 245) £1380 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £12922.10[24]Jono Hale (Case number 3203977/2022) Unfair dismissal (£0.00+ £.0.00 + £660.21 = £660.21 Redundancy Pay (9 weeks x £416.62) £3124.65 Protective award for failure to consult: £1872.39 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x 416.62) £1666.48 Notice pay £3739.58 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £12683.31[25]Jessica Howett (Case number 3203993/2022) Unfair Dismissal – No award (requirement of two years continuous service not met.) Redundancy Pay: No award (requirement of two years continuous service not met) Protective award for failure to consult: no award ) requirement of two years continuous service not met) Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £37.78) £151.12 Holiday pay £5.04 Notice pay £75.56 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £231.72[26]Amanda Hurford (Case number 3204574/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00+£352.01+£425.00= £777.01 Redundancy Pay (4 weeks x £33.25) £199.50 Protective award for failure to consult: £232.80 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £33.25) £199.50 Holiday pay £33.42 Notice pay £166.25 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £1608.48[27]Sarah Hutchinson (Case number 3204021/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £4447.44 + £420 = £4867.47 Redundancy Pay (2 weeks x £359.22) £1077.66 Protective award for failure to consult: £2778.56 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £359.22) £1436. 88 Notice pay £718.44 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £11126.01[28]Ross Lines ( Case number 3203970/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £0.00 + £832.24 = £832.24 Redundancy Pay (9 weeks x £323.90) £2753.15 Protective award for failure to consult: £971.70 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £323.90) £1295.56 Notice pay £2915.10 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £9147.75[29]Lawrence Lubbock (Case number 3203962/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £2293.60 + £653.00 = £2946.60 Redundancy Pay (2 weeks x £546.75) £1093.50 Protective award for failure to consult: £5334.39 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £546.75) £2187 Holiday pay £1421.55 Notice pay £65.61 TOTAL AMOUNT PAYABLE: £13048.65[30]Kira North (Case number 3204053/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + ££655.23 + £420.00 = £1075.23 Redundancy Pay (4 weeks x £ 215.73) £862.92 Protective award for failure to consult: £0 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £215.73) £1725.84 Holiday pay Nil (no claim) Notice pay £862.92 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £4526.91[31]Ian Ridgewell (Case number 3204022/2022) Unfair Dismissal – No award made (requirement of two years continuous service) Redundancy Pay: No award made (requirement of two years continuous service not met) Protective award for failure to consult: no award made (requirement of two year continuous service not met) Loss of wages (4 weeks x £237.50) £950 Holiday pay £363.85 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £2263.85[32]Callum Riordan (Case number 3203999/2022) Unfair dismissal – No Unfair Dismissal Claim Redundancy Pay (4 weeks x £272) £544 Protective award for failure to consult: £2176.00 Loss of wages (4 weeks x £272) £1088 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £6052[33]Jake Simmons (Case no 3204268/2022) Unfair dismissal – No unfair dismissal claim Redundancy Pay (3 weeks x £37.82) £56.73 Protective award for failure to consult: £302.56 Unpaid wages £277.56 Holiday pay Nil (no claim) Notice pay £151.28 (4 weeks) TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £788.13[34]Sam Smith (Case number 3204267/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £462.67 + £420.00 = £882.67 Redundancy Pay (6 weeks x £146.88) £514.08 Protective award for failure to consult: £881.28 Unpaid wages (4 x £146.88) £587.52 Holiday pay Nil (no claim made) Notice pay £881.28 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £3746.83[35]Amanda Stewart (Case number 3203963/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £0.00 + £565.90 Redundancy Pay (13 weeks x £258.73) £4139.68 Protective award for failure to consult: £0. Unpaid wages (4 x 258.73) £1034.92 Holiday pay £1136.41 Notice pay £3104.76 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £9981.67[36]Lindsey Whitfield (Case number 3203972/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £1134.13+ £526.47 = £1660.60 Redundancy Pay (8 weeks x £261.25) £2090 Protective award for failure to consult £1045.00 Unpaid wages (4 x £261.25) £1045 Holiday pay £454.10 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £8384.70 Case Number: 3203961/2022 & Others EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss Amanda Stewart and others Respondent: PARC (Essex) Limited NOTICE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Pursuant to Rule 69 of Schedule 1 of The Tribunal Rules of Procedure (Correction of Clerical Mistakes), the name that appeared in the Reconsideration Judgment as ‘Lesley Whitfield (Case number 3203972/2022)’ (paragraphs 5.21 and 36) shall be amended to ‘Lindsey Whitfield (Case number 3203972/2022)’.The hearing
[1]The request for reconsideration of Miss Stewart’s protective award for failure to consult is granted.[2]The request for reconsideration of Ms Dodge’s protective award for failure to consult is granted.[3]The request for reconsideration of Ms Howett’s awards for unfair dismissal and a redundancy payment is granted.[4]The tribunal has of its own initiative reconsidered and varied the protective awards for failure to consult for all of the claimants.[5]The Claimants are therefore entitled to payments from the Respondent as follows:5.1 The Respondent is ordered to pay Tierney Butcher (Case number 3203994/2022) the total sum of £3241.60;5.2 The Respondent is ordered to pay Suzanne Dodge (Case number 3204540/2022) the total sum of £10,032.30;5.3 The Respondent is ordered to pay Jayne Dow (Case number 3204411/2022) the total sum of £15,849.03;5.4 The Respondent is ordered to pay Layla Earley (Case number 3204150/2022) the total sum of £7727.21;5.5 The Respondent is ordered to pay Emma Frearson (Case number 3204407/2022) the total sum of £21936.61;5.6 The Respondent is ordered to pay Chris Frisbee (Case number 3203978/2022) the total sum of £12203.05;5.7 The Respondent is ordered to pay Niamh Gibson (Case number 3203961/2022) the total sum of £10252.95;5.8 The Respondent is ordered to pay Georgia Gray (Case number 3203971/2022) the total sum of: £14794.82;5.9 The Respondent is ordered to pay Jono Hale (Case number 3203977/2022) the total sum of: £15810.36;5.10 The Respondent is ordered to pay Jessica Howett (Case number 3203993/2022 the total sum of £1590.95;5.11 The Respondent is ordered to pay Amanda Hurford (Case number 3204574/2022) the total sum of £1774.68;5.12 The Respondent is ordered to pay Sarah Hutchinson (Case number 3204021/2022) the total sum of £12658.09;5.13 The Respondent is ordered to pay Ross Lines (Case number 3203970/2022) the total sum of £12062.85;5.14 The Respondent is ordered to pay Lawrence Lubbock (Case number 3203962/2022) the total sum of £14275.26;5.15 The Respondent is ordered to pay Kira North (Case number 3204053/2022) the total sum of £7115.67;5.16 The Respondent is ordered to pay Ian Redgewell (Case number 3204022/2022) the total sum of £5113.85;5.17 The Respondent is ordered to pay Callum Riordan (Case number 3203999/2022) the total sum of £7140;5.18 The Respondent is ordered to pay Jake Simmons (Case number 3204268/2022) the total sum of £939.41;5.19 The Respondent is ordered to pay Sam Smith (Case number 3204267/2022) the total sum of £4628.11;5.20 The Respondent is ordered to pay Amanda Stewart (Case number 3203963/2022) the total sum of £13086.43;5.21 The Respondent is ordered to pay Lindsey Whitfield (Case number 3203972/2022) the total sum of £10474.70.The hearing
[1]On 25 June 2023, Ms Stewart on behalf of herself and Ms Dodge, asked for their respective protective awards for failure to consult to be reconsidered. Ms Stewart had received a nil protective award for failure to consult and Ms Dodge had received a lower award than some of her colleagues who lesser periods of continuous service than she had. Ms Stewart questioned both awards on both grounds. On the same date, Ms Stewart also asked us to reconsider Ms Howett’s awards for unfair dismissal and redundancy. This was on the basis that Ms Howett’s start date for her continuous employment on her contract of employment was 10 March 2020 (as opposed to 3 December 2020 which had been provided on her schedule of loss). With the request for reconsideration, Ms Stewart provided the tribunal with a copy of Ms Howett’s contract of employment. We agreed to reconsider these awards pursuant to Rules 70 - 72 of The Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. Furthermore, in light of our decision to consider the protective awards for failure to consult in respect of Ms Stewart and Ms Dodge, we decided, of our own initiative, to reconsider the protective awards for failure to consult that we had made to all the other claimants, pursuant to Rule 73 and Rule 72(2) of The Employment Tribunal Rules. We reconsidered our decision in relation to these awards on 7 August 2023.[2]Our previous decision in relation to all the claimants’ protective awards for failure to consult at paragraph 7 of the original judgment stated: ‘7. Protective award for failure to consult: We have awarded a sum equivalent to one week’s pay for each week of the protected period of 90 days (12 weeks), each of the Claimants who were entitled to claim this award by virtue of having two years’ continuous employment.’[3]On reconsideration that was wrong because we had initially off-set the Claimants’ protective awards by any awards made for pay in lieu of notice. This had the effect of reducing the protective award for Claimants with longer periods of service. We had also declined to make protective awards for failure to consult to claimants who did not have two years’ continuous service. We consider that these were regrettable errors, and that it is in the interests of justice, pursuant to rule 70 ET Rules, to reconsider the judgment in this respect and to re-calculated the protective awards for all claimants. Accordingly, paragraph 7 of the reserved judgment and the respective calculations of the claimants’ protective awards at paragraphs 16 – 26 of the original judgment are reconsidered as below.[4]On reconsideration the judgment is now: ‘7. Protective award for failure to consult: We have awarded a sum equivalent to one week’s pay for each week of the protected period of 90 days (12 weeks) to all of the Claimants as they all are entitled to claim this award.’[5]Our previous decision in relation to Ms Howett’s awards at Paragraph 25 stated: ‘25. Jessica Howett (Case number 3203993/2022) Unfair Dismissal – No award (requirement of two years continuous service not met.) Redundancy Pay: No award (requirement of two years continuous service not met) Protective award for failure to consult: no award) requirement of two years continuous service not met) TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £231.72’[6]On reconsideration the judgment is now: ‘25. We consider that Ms Howett is entitled to awards for unfair dismissal and redundancy on the basis that she had two years’ continuous employment at the time of her redundancy. Ms Howett’s contract of employment, which was provided to us in support of her application for reconsideration, states that the start date of her period of continuous employment was 10 March 2020 (as opposed to 3 December 2020 which was the date which had been provided in her schedule of loss). We accept the date as specified in the contract of employment and make the following awards: Unfair Dismissal: (£0.00 + £468.09 + £400) £868.09 Redundancy Pay: (2 weeks x £37.78 x 0.05 (under 21)): £37.78 Protective award for failure to consult: (£37.78 x 12): £453.36 TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £1590.95’[7]The Reconsidered Protective Awards for failure to consult for all claimants, upon reconsideration, are now:[16]Tierney Butcher (Case number 3203994/2022) Unfair dismissal(a) (A) £0 plus(b) (B) £1418.50 plus(c) (C) £420 = £1838.50 Redundancy pay (4 years x £50 gross weekly wages (under 21)) £200 revised amount (£50 x 12) £600.00 Unpaid wages £413.10 Holiday pay not specified and no award made) Notice pay (4 weeks @£50) £200 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £3241.60[17]Suzanne Dodge (Case number 3204540/2022) Unfair dismissal () £0.00 + £0.00 + £477.63 = £477.63 Redundancy pay (7 years x £299 gross weekly pay) £2093 Reconsidered protective award for failure to consult (299 x 12) £3588 Unpaid wages £1148.92 Holiday pay £631.75 Notice Pay (7 weeks x £299) £2093 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £10,032.30[18]Jayne Dow (Case number 3204411/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £6542.56 + £420 = £6962.25 Redundancy Pay (7 years x £232.75) £2443.88 Reconsidered Protective award for failure to consult (12 x £232.75): £2793.00 Unpaid wages (£232.75 gross weekly wage x 4) £931 Holiday pay £1555.15 Notice pay (5 weeks x £232.75) £1163.75 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £15,849.03[19]Layla Earley (Case number 3204150/2022) Unfair dismissal (£0.00 + £2987.25 +£525.00 = £3512.25. Redundancy Pay (7 years x £152) £912 (£152x12) £1824 Unpaid wages (£152 x 4) £1216 Holiday pay £250.80 Notice pay £12.16 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £7727.21[20]Emma Frearson (Case number 3204407/2022) Unfair dismissal ((0.00 + £7629.30 + £617.85 = £8247.15 Redundancy Pay (8 years x £382.50) £3060 (£382.50 x 12) £4590 Unpaid wages (£382.50 x 4) £1530 Outstanding Maternity pay £380.46 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £21936.61[21]Chris Frisbee (Case number 3203978/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £1204.49 + £581.11= £1785.60 Redundancy Pay (4 weeks x £365.96) £1463.84 (£365.96 x 12) £4391.54) Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £365.96) £1463.84 Holiday pay £826.25 Notice pay £1463.84 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £12203.05[22]Niamh Gibson (Case number 3203961/2022) Unfair dismissal (£0.00 + £0.00 + £634.20 = £634.20 Redundancy Pay (5 weeks x £356.25) £1068.75 (£356.25 x 12) £4275.00 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £356.25) £1425 Holiday pay £1068.75 Notice pay £1781.25 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £10252.95[23]Georgia Gray (Case number 3203971/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £5636.83 + £670.99 = £6307.82 Redundancy Pay (6 weeks x £345) £1035 x 12) £4140.00 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x 245) £1380 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £14794.82[24]Jono Hale (Case number 3203977/2022) Unfair dismissal (£0.00+ £.0.00 + £660.21 = £660.21 Redundancy Pay (9 weeks x £416.62) £3124.65 (£416.62 x 12) £4999.44 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x 416.62) £1666.48 Notice pay £3739.58 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £15810.36[25]Jessica Howett (Case number 3203993/2022) We consider that Ms Howett is entitled to an award for unfair dismissal and redundancy on the basis that she had two years’ continuous employment at the time of her redundancy. We have also revised her protective award for failure to consult. Ms Howett’s contract of employment, which was provided to us in support of her application for reconsideration, states that the start date of her period of continuous employment was 10 March 2020 (as opposed to 3 December 2020 which had been provided in her schedule of loss). We accept the date as specified in the contract of employment and make the following awards: Reconsidered Unfair Dismissal: (£0.00 + £468.09 + £400) £868.09 Reconsidered Redundancy Pay: (2 weeks x £37.78 x 0.05 (under 21)): £37.78 (£37.78 x 12): £453.36 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £1590.95[26]Amanda Hurford (Case number 3204574/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00+£352.01+£425.00= £777.01 Redundancy Pay (4 weeks x £33.25) £199.50 (£33.25 x 12) £399.00 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £33.25) £199.50 Holiday pay £33.42 Notice pay £166.25 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £1774.68[27]Sarah Hutchinson (Case number 3204021/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £4447.44 + £420 = £4867.47 Redundancy Pay (2 weeks x £359.22) £1077.66 £359.22 x 12) £4310.64 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £359.22) £1436. 88 Notice pay £718.44 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £12658.09[28]Ross Lines (Case number 3203970/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £0.00 + £832.24 = £832.24 Redundancy Pay (9 weeks x £323.90) £2753.15 (£323.90 x 12) £3886.80 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £323.90) £1295.56 Notice pay £2915.10 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £12062.85[29]Lawrence Lubbock (Case number 3203962/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £2293.60 + £653.00 = £2946.60 Redundancy Pay (2 weeks x £546.75) £1093.50 (£546.75 x 12) £6561.00 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £546.75) £2187 Holiday pay £1421.55 Notice pay £65.61 RECONSIDERED TOTAL AMOUNT AWARDED: £14275.26[30]Kira North (Case number 3204053/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + ££655.23 + £420.00 = £1075.23 Redundancy Pay (4 weeks x £ 215.73) £862.92 (£215.73 x 12) £2588.76 Unpaid wages (4 weeks x £215.73) £1725.84 Holiday pay Nil (no claim) Notice pay £862.92 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £7115.67[31]Ian Redgewell (Case number 3204022/2022) Unfair Dismissal – No award made (requirement of two years continuous service) Redundancy Pay: No award made (requirement of two years continuous service not met) (237.50 x 12) £2850 Loss of wages (4 weeks x £237.50) £950 Holiday pay £363.85 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £5113.85[32]Callum Riordan (Case number 3203999/2022) Unfair dismissal – No Unfair Dismissal Claim Redundancy Pay (4 weeks x £272) £544 x 12) £3264 Loss of wages (4 weeks x £272) £1088 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £7140[33]Jake Simmons (Case no 3204268/2022) Unfair dismissal – No unfair dismissal claim Redundancy Pay (3 weeks x £37.82) £56.73 x 12): £939.41 Unpaid wages £277.56 Holiday pay Nil (no claim) Notice pay £151.28 (4 weeks) RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £939.41[34]Sam Smith (Case number 3204267/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £462.67 + £420.00 = £882.67 Redundancy Pay (6 weeks x £146.88) £514.08 (£146.88 x 12) £1762.56 Unpaid wages (4 x £146.88) £587.52 Holiday pay Nil (no claim made) Notice pay £881.28 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £4628.11[35]Amanda Stewart (Case number 3203963/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £0.00 + £565.90 Redundancy Pay (13 weeks x £258.73) £4139.68 (£258.73 x 12) £3104.76 Unpaid wages (4 x 258.73) £1034.92 Holiday pay £1136.41 Notice pay £3104.76 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £13086.43[36]Lindsey Whitfield (Case number 3203972/2022) Unfair dismissal £0.00 + £1134.13+ £526.47 = £1660.60 Redundancy Pay (8 weeks x £261.25) £2090 £261.25 x 12) £3135 Unpaid wages (4 x £261.25) £1045 Holiday pay £454.10 RECONSIDERED TOTAL SUM AWARDED: £10474.70