Mr D Ireson Hughes v Gold Standard Group Ltd: 3202197/2018

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3202197/2018
Mr D Ireson-HughesClaimantGold Standard Group LtdRespondent
Employment Judge GilbertIn person for claimantDate 8 March 2019

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The respondent has failed to enter a response to the claim.[2]The claim succeeds and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at the hearing on 4 February 2019 which has been converted to a Remedy Hearing. Employment Judge Gilbert 21/01/2019 Case Number: 3202197/2018 1 RM EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr D Ireson-Hughes Respondent: Gold Standard Group Limited Heard at: East London Hearing Centre On: 4 February 2019 Before: Employment Judge C Hyde Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr M Cameron, Consultant REMEDY JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is that: -[1]The name of the Respondent was amended from “Michael Sadairo (Gold Standard Group Limited)” to “Gold Standard Group Limited” forthwith.[2]The Respondent’s application to set aside the judgment which was made by Employment Judge Gilbert on 21 January 2019 under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure was refused.[3]It was declared that the Respondent had unlawfully deducted the sum of £139,423.10 gross from the Claimant’s wages in respect of 29 weeks at the rate of £4807.70 per week.[4]The breach of contract and holiday pay claims were not well founded and were dismissed.