Ms F Yilmaz v Bahay Kubo Housing Association: 3202143/2024
JUDGMENT
[1]Upon hearing the in-time application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA”), it appears to the Tribunal that it is likely that it will find that, by virtue of section 103A of ERA, the Claimant has been unfairly dismissed.[2]The Respondent being unwilling to reinstate or re-engage the Claimant the Tribunal orders, under section 129(9)(b) ERA, that the Claimant’s contract of employment shall continue in force:a. For the purposes of pay or any other benefit derived from the employment, seniority, pension rights and other similar matters; andb. For the purpose of determining for any period for which the Claimant has been continuously employed. From the date of its termination by the Respondent (being 13 November 2024) to the determination or settlement of the complaint. Case Number: 3202143/2024[3]The Respondent shall pay the Claimant £849.34 gross on the 25th day of each month from 1 January 2025.