Mr S Miah v Tesco plc: 3201933/2019
JUDGMENT
Upon the Application of Counsel for the Respondent to strike out the claims, the Claimant not appearing nor being represented and the Tribunal’s inquiries as to the same proving unsuccessful, the Claimant’s claims are struck out.REASONS
[1]This matter was listed for a Case Management Hearing at 2pm, 14 November 2019. The Respondent duly appeared, in good time, by Counsel Mr Ben Brown, but the Claimant did not nor was he represented.[2]On the Tribunal file there is copy correspondence both from the Tribunal and the Respondent directly to the Claimant at the email address on the file, namely “shelz112@hotmail.co.uk”, but to which there has been no response from the Claimant, either to the Tribunal or to the Respondent, the latter information being told me by Mr Brown at this Hearing.[3]On 21 September the Claimant was sent a strike out warning letter, to the aforesaid email address, requiring the Claimant to show reasons why the claim should not be struck out for want of jurisdiction. The Claimant was to show such reasons by Case Number: 3201933/2019 20 October 2019 but no such reasons have been received. Accordingly, I acceded to Mr Brown’s Application to strike out the claims, which are duly dismissed. ………………………………………………………….