Mr L Turner v SJS Print Services Ltd and Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy: 3201098/2018
JUDGMENT
[1]The Claimant was dismissed by the First Respondent by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £6,354.88.[2]It was not reasonably practicable for the Claimant to present his claims for notice and holiday pay within the primary time limits contained in the Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 and Working Time Regulations 1998 and these claims were presented within a reasonable period of it becoming practicable to do so.[3]The Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice by the First Respondent and it is ordered to pay damages to the Claimant in the sum of £4,993.12.[4]The First Respondent has failed to pay the Claimant’s holiday entitlement and is ordered to pay the Claimant the sum of £817.02.[5]The claims against the Second Respondent are rejected under Section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, the Claimant having failed to obtain an early conciliation certificate naming the Secretary of State. Case Number: 3201098/2018REASONS
[1]The Claimant, Mr Lee Turner, was employed by the First Respondent, SJS Print Services, between 1 February 2006 and 23 September 2017 when he was dismissed upon the First Respondent ceasing trading. I am satisfied that the reason for his dismissal was redundancy.[2]The Claimant presented this claim to the Tribunal on 23 May 2018 having gone through early conciliation with the First Respondent on 18 to 22 May 2018. He did not go through early conciliation with the Second Respondent. I have rejected the claim against the Second Respondent on this basis.[3]I am satisfied that the Claimant’s claim for a redundancy payment was presented within the time limit contained in section 164(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. I find that the claims for notice and holiday pay were presented outside the primary time limits contained in the Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 and Working Time Regulations 1998. Accordingly, the Tribunal would only have jurisdiction to hear them were it satisfied that it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claims within the primary period and that they were presented within such further period as was reasonable.[4]I accept the Claimant’s explanation that he was unaware of the need to bring a claim for notice and holiday pay in the Tribunal in circumstances where it was unclear whether his former employer was in a formal insolvency process (which it is not) and that he reasonably believed that it was sufficient to make a claim to the Secretary of State (which he did). I find that he presented this claim within a reasonable time of learning that the Secretary of State would not meet his claims for notice and holiday pay.[5]The Claimant was aged 47 at the date of his dismissal (born 16 December 1969) and has 11 complete years’ service. He earned £453.92 gross per week (£1,967 gross pcm); the statutory cap on a week’s pay, £489 at the date of his dismissal, does not bite in the Claimant's case. I find that he was entitled to 11 weeks’ statutory notice and accept his evidence that he had 9 days accrued and untaken holiday at the time of dismissal at a daily rate of £90.78 gross.[6]Accordingly, I calculate his claims as follows:a. Redundancy: 14 x £453.92 = £6,534.88b. Notice; 11 x £453.92 = £4,993.12c. Holiday pay: 9 x £90.78 = £817.02