Mr J Baker v KA Ltd: 3200618/2020

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 3200618/2020
Between
Mr J BakerClaimantKA Limited DEFAULT JUDGMENT Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 1. The Respondent has failed to enter a response to the Claimant’s claims and pursuant to rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 judgment is issued in his favour in respect his unpaid wages claims and unpaid notice. 2. The Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the total sum of £520 in respect of his claim for 8 days unpaid salary in respect of January 2020. 3. The Claimant was required to notifiy the Tribunal with the details of the amount he is claiming and why 3 April 2020. No details have been provided. He has not provided sufficient particulars for the Tribunal to asses the amount of the holiday pay claim and he did not attend the preliminary hearing on 20 July 2020 to outline assert the basis for the claim. Therefore he has not established that he is entitled to a specific amount in this regard. 4. The Respondent is therefore ordered to pay the Claimant the total sum of £520 in respect of his claims.Respondent
Before
Employment Judge Burgher DateDate 20 July 2020

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The Respondent has failed to enter a response to the Claimant’s claims and pursuant to rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 judgment is issued in his favour in respect his unpaid wages claims and unpaid notice.[2]The Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the total sum of £520 in respect of his claim for 8 days unpaid salary in respect of January 2020.[3]The Claimant was required to notifiy the Tribunal with the details of the amount he is claiming and why 3 April 2020. No details have been provided. He has not provided sufficient particulars for the Tribunal to asses the amount of the holiday pay claim and he did not attend the preliminary hearing on 20 July 2020 to outline assert the basis for the claim. Therefore he has not established that he is entitled to a specific amount in this regard.[4]The Respondent is therefore ordered to pay the Claimant the total sum of £520 in respect of his claims.