Mr A Lancaster and others v Mitie Group plc and others: 3200587/2023 and others
JUDGMENT
3200587/2023 A Lancaster -v- Unibail-Rodamco Westfield & Mitie Group plc 3200588/2023 C Bempah -v- Unibail-Rodamco Westfield & Mitie Group plc 3200589/2023 I Lawal -v- Unibail-Rodamco Westfield & Mitie Group plc 3200590/2023 M Haque -v- Unibail-Rodamco Westfield & Mitie Group plc 3200805/2023 I Lawal -v- Westfield Europe Limited 3200806/2023 M Haque -v- Westfield Europe Limited 3200807/2023 A Lancaster -v- Westfield Europe Limited 3200808/2023 C Bempah -v- Westfield Europe Limited[1]The Tribunal accedes to the applications on behalf of R2 and R3 that R2 and R3 have been wrongly included in the claims listed above. The Tribunal therefore removes R2 and R3 from the claims pursuant to Rule 34 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure. Case Number: 3200587/2023 & Others[2]All of the claims brought against R2 and R3 listed above have no reasonable prospect of success and are therefore struck out and dismissed pursuant to Rule 37 of the Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure.[3]These determinations have no impact on the claims brought against R1.