Mr J Gierti v Lynx Dry Cleaning Supplies Ltd 3200251/2017
JUDGMENT
[1]The holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal.[2]The unfair dismissal complaint under section 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (“the 1996 Act”) was well founded.[3]The Respondent was ordered to pay to the Claimant compensation for unfair dismissal as follows:a. £930 in respect of the basic awardb. £500 in respect of loss of statutory rightsc. £100 increase under section 124A(a) of the 1996 Act.[4]All other claims for remedy for unfair dismissal were not well founded and were dismissed.[5]The Respondent was ordered to reimburse to the Claimant by way of a costs order, the sums of £20 and £950 in respect of the issue and hearing fees paid by the Claimant. 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 Case No: 3200251/2017[6]The complaint under section 93(2) of the 1996 Act was not well founded and was dismissed.[7]The Respondent was ordered to pay to the Claimant the sum of £1240 representing 4 weeks’ statutory pay under section 124A(b) of the 1996 Act.[8]The Respondent was ordered to pay to the Claimant the sum of £620 representing 2 weeks’ statutory pay under section 11 of the Employment Relations Act 1999.REASONS
[1]The reasons for the Tribunal’s Judgment on the application for reconsideration are set out herein only to the extent that the Tribunal considers it necessary to do so in order to explain its decision, and only to the extent that it is proportionate to do so.[2]The Respondent has not put forward any grounds which would justify a reconsideration. The written reasons for the Judgment have addressed the case put in the application for the reconsideration and they were considered and dismissed at the hearing. The Respondent simply fails to accept the outcome. These are not adequate grounds for a reconsideration.[3]In summary, the application for reconsideration does not raise any matters which would lead the Judge to consider that there was a reasonable prospect of the original Judgment being varied or revoked. 11.6C Judgment – Reconsideration refused – claimant - rule 72 Case No: 3200251/2017 In those circumstances, having regard to the terms of Rule 72(1) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the application for reconsideration is hereby refused.