Mr O Staniokas v AKS Refurbishment Ltd: 3200247/2019
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim succeeds and the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing .[2]The hearing listed on 3 June 2019 will now proceed as a remedy hearing. Employment Judge Gilbert Date: 21 May 2019 Case Number : 3200 247/2019 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February 2018 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr O Staniokas Respondent: AKS refurbishment Ltd Heard at: East London Employment Tribunal On: 3 June 2019 Before: Employment Judge Gilbert Representation Claimant: litigant in person Respondent: no attendance and appearance not entered Interpreter: Ms J Gulbinovic[1]A Rule 21 judgment was entered for the Claimant on 21 May 2019 and entered on the register and sent to the parties on 24 May 2019. The hearing listed for today was converted to a remedy hearing.[2]The Claimant worked for the Respondent as a painter decorator. He worked 23 ½ days at a daily rate of £125 in the sum of £2937.50. He worked an additional two hours on nine of those days at the same rate of pay in the sum of £281. 25. The Claimant worked one further day at a piece rate of £350. That makes a total sum due to the Claimant of £3568.75. The Respondent made four payments totally £1,800 to the Claimant for the work done. The final payment was made on 10 September 2018.[3]The outstanding balance to the Claimant is £1,768.75 and the Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant the said sum of £1768.75. That is a gross sum any liability for tax lies with the Claimant.[4]At no time was the claimant provided with itemised pay statements to which he was entitled.