Ms R Harman v Strettons Ltd: 3200032/2020 and 3200537/2020
JUDGMENT
[1]the Claimant’s claim in respect of accrued, but untaken, holiday (Reg 14, WTR 1998) is dismissed on withdrawal;[2]the Claimant did not undertake like work, by comparison with the work undertaken by her male comparator, and the Respondent did not breach the implied sex equality clause (s.66 EqA);[3]the Claimant’s claim that the Respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments (s.20 EqA) is not well-founded, and is dismissed;[4]the Claimant’s claim that the Respondent treated her unfavourably because of something arising in consequence of her disability (s.15 EqA) is not well-founded, and is dismissed[5]the Claimant was not constructively dismissed.