Mr N Thompson v Hollis House Investments Ltd: 2603588/2019
JUDGMENT
The response is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 26 September 2020 the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because• it has not been actively pursued.[2]The respondent has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The response is therefore struck out.[3]The respondent will be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal but will only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. _____________________________ Employment Judge Heap Date: 25/11/2020[1]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £353.44.[2]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £394.23.[3]The respondent failed to comply with the duty to inform and consult on a transfer of the claimant’s employment to them and is ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of £5,124.99.[4]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £946.00.