Ms B Rutkowska v S and L Personnel Ltd: 2602322/2018
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim succeeds against the third and fourth respondents.[2]Discussion as to remedy will form part of the hearing (TCMPH) listed for 8 March 2019 bearing in mind that the first Respondent has entered a response and the second Respondent as named at present is not a legal entity.[3]As the Claimant was ordered to serve her schedule of loss by the 10th January 2019 but appears so far to have not done so, this must be done within 14 days of the date of this judgment so that it can be discussed on the 8th March. Employment Judge P Britton _____________________________ Date: 18 February 2019 Case no. 2602322/2018 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms B Rutkowska Respondents:(1) S and L Personnel Limited(2) Eddie Stobart Limited(3) Mr Adam Zarebski(4) Mr Steve Coblay Representation: For the claimant: Mr Gracka, Consultant For the respondents: (R1) Mr Haynes, Consultant (R2) - (R4) Mr Moore, SolicitorREASONS
[1]The claim form was not received by the Second, Third or Fourth Respondent when it was originally served. An extension of time was granted by EJ Hutchinson until 5 May 2019. Responses were ultimately lodged on 21 May 2019. However, the delay between 5 and 21 May 2019 was caused by a failure of the tribunal administration to properly serve the Second, Third and Fourth Respondents. A further extension of time to 21 May 2019 was therefore granted. In light of the foregoing, by consent it was agreed that the rule 21 judgment should be set aside.