Miss L O’Shea v BL Salon Ltd: 2602280/2019
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant, to be determined at a remedy hearing.[2]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,066.86.[3]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and is ordered to pay the claimant a sum to be determined at a remedy hearing.[4]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and is ordered to pay the claimant a sum to be determined at a remedy hearing.[5]The hearing listed on 22nd November 2019 has been converted to a Remedy hearing. All arrangements for the hearing remain the same and the parties are to take this as a revised Notice of Hearing. Employment Judge Clark _____________________________ Date: 17 October 2019 Case No: 2602280/2019 Page 1 of 2 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss L O’Shea Respondent: B S Salon Limited Heard at: Nottingham On: 22 November 2019 Before: Employment Judge Rachel Broughton (Sitting alone) Representatives Claimant: In Person Respondent: No Attendance[1]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £753.20[2]The respondent has failed pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £385.42[3]The claim for unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages in respect of no payment of pension contributions by the respondent has been withdrawn by the claimant. A Judgment will be issued dismissing this part of the claim within 14 days from the date of this Judgment under rule 52 unless the claimant confirms within that 14 day period in writing why such a Judgment should not be made. The 14 day period provides the claimant with the opportunity to confirm that all payments have been paid. If the tribunal dismisses the claim, it cannot be revived. Case No: 2602280/2019 Page 2 of 2