A Crump Smith v Secretary of State and Others: 2602275/2022
JUDGMENT
[1]The proceedings are dismissed against the following respondents upon withdrawal by the claimant:• Paul Yates second respondent• Noel Slattery third respondent• Andrew Burton fourth respondent• Terry Pagram fifth respondent• Peter Wright sixth respondent• Paul Cawkwell seventh respondent• Karen Head eight respondent Useful information[2]All judgments and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents.[3]There is information about Employment Tribunal procedures, including case management and preparation, compensation for injury to feelings, and pension loss, here: https://www.judiciary.uk/publications/employment-rules-and-legislation-practice-directions/ Case Number: 2602275/2022 Page 2 of 2[4]The Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure are here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/employment-tribunal-procedure-rules[5]You can appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal if you think a legal mistake was made in an Employment Tribunal decision. There is more information here: https://www.gov.uk/appeal-employment-appeal-tribunal Employment Judge N Wilson Date: 28 May 2023 ……...…………………….. Case No: 2602275/2022 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Alison Crump-Smith Respondent: Secretary of State for Justice Heard at: Nottingham On: 15 to 19 July 2024 and 22 to 25 July 2024 Before: Employment Judge McTigue Ms D Newton Ms L Lowe Representation Claimant: In Person. Supported by her husband, Mr Crump-Smith Respondent: Mr B Gray of Counsel[1]The complaint of unfair dismissal is not well-founded and is dismissed.[2]The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is not well-founded and is dismissed.[3]The complaint of direct disability discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed.[4]The complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability is not well-founded and is dismissed.[5]The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability is not well-founded and is dismissed.[6]The complaint of harassment related to disability is not well-founded and is dismissed.[7]The complaint of direct sex discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed.