Ms C Josey v Intesa (Leicester) Ltd: 2602064/2022
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 (“Rules”) – Rule 21 The respondent having failed to file a response to the claimant’s claims within the required time limit, the Employment Judge decided that a determination can properly be made on the liability on the claim in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules. Consequently, the claimant’s claim under this claim number succeed and the remedy is to be determined at a Default Judgment Remedy Hearing. A Remedy Hearing will be listed for 2 hour. A notice of hearing will follow shortly. Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer 16 August 2023 Sent to the parties on: 17 August 2023 For the Tribunal Office: Raj Sohal CASE NO: 2602064/2022 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss Caitlan Josey Respondent: Intesa (Leicester) Limited Record of a Judgment at a Remedy Hearing by CVP at the Employment Tribunal Heard at: Nottingham Heard on: 7 March 2024 Before: Employment Judge Hutchinson (sitting alone) Appearances: Claimant: In person Respondents: No appearance JUDGMENT The Employment Judge gave Judgment as follows:[1]The Claimant was unfairly dismissed, and the Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant: 1.1. Basic Award £254.31. 1.2. Compensatory Award £3,424.68. CASE NO: 2602064/2022 2[2]The Claimant has suffered discrimination because of the protected characteristic of being on maternity leave and the Respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the Claimant as follows: 2.1. Injury to feelings £10,000.00. 2.2. Interest £643.86.[3]The Respondent has failed to provide to the Claimant a Statement of Terms and Conditions of Employment in accordance with Section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The Respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the Claimant in the sum of £1,017.24.[4]The Respondent is ordered to pay to the Claimant a total sum of £15,340.09.