Mrs M A Hagan v A Cox: 2601727/2021 and 2601757/2021
JUDGMENT
The response is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 15th March 2022 the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because• it has not been actively pursued.[2]The respondent has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The response is therefore struck out.[3]The respondent will be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal but will only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. _____________________________ Employment Judge Hutchinson Dated 25 March 2022 Multiple Schedule: Case Number: 2601727/2021 & 2601757/2021 1 of 2 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs M A Hagan Respondent: Ashley Cox Heard at: Midlands East via Cloud Video Platform On: 4 April 2022 Before: Employment Judge Brewer Representation Claimant: Mr P H Hagan Respondent: No appearance[1]The claimant’s claim for a redundancy payment succeeds;[2]The claimant’s claim for breach of contract (notice pay) succeeds;[3]The claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages (unpaid holiday pay for accrued untaken holiday) succeeds. The respondent shall pay to the claimant the following sums:[1]A statutory redundancy payment of £6,144.00 (8 x 1.5 x £512.00); Notice pay of £3,200.00 (8 weeks’ pay); Holiday pay of £1,387.00 (26 days pay).