Mr H Raidhan v Secretary of State for the Department of Work and Pensions: 2601563/2019
JUDGMENT
The complaints of indirect discrimination, harassment and victimisation based on association or perception on grounds of religion or belief is struck out.REASONS
[1]By letter dated 2nd July 2019 the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to show why the above claims should not be struck out.[2]The Claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaints of discrimination are therefore struck out. Employment Judge Heap 18th July 2019 6.3 Strike Out Judgment – claim – part - rule 37 Case No:2601563/2019 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr H Raidhan Respondent: DWP[1]By letter dated 2nd July 2019 the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to show why the above claim should not be struck out.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of unfair dismissal is therefore struck out.[3]The claims relating to religious discrimination having also been struck out on 18 July, it therefore means that the remaining claims are age discrimination by association; breach of contract; non-payment of holiday pay and non-payment of wages. Employment Judge Britton 22 July 2019 6.3 Strike Out Judgment – claim – part - rule 37 Case no: 2601563/2019 6.8 Judgment on Withdrawal rule 52 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr H Raidhan Respondent: Department For Work And Pensions